So I was happily just watching away waiting for the storyline to kick in, which I had no idea what was about if I'm totally honest I'd not heard of this disgusting 'Donkey Punch' sexual act before... So that happened in the film, which was all a bit fast and extremely unbelievable (and quite gross too) and the storyline jumped to a go. The first 20 minutes of the film will all the dirty sex talk and the subsequent sex seemed to kind of have a meaning when but into conjuction with that of the storyline catalyst, and I was torn between my disire to turn of the programme and sleep or watch and discover what happened to these reasonably beleivable characters. I chose to watch, and I'm glad I did. The film was simply fantastic! - In an odd kind of 'i'm-gonna-be-disturbed-forever' kind of way. But the characters ways of coping with the fact that one of their peers (and sibling of one, which did indeed make the first 20 minutes all the worse) had murdered someone in a sick sexual voilence act was brilliantly portrayed, and I think written too - and shot! There were many of the desolate shots of the yacht out in an open and lonely sea. I just thought the film was so interesting to watch, the way the characters changed so much in relation to death, and their fear of guilt and fear of jail (which says alot for the goverment system in the UK. I'm not sure if anyone else following my blog has seen this film, cause I would be intrested to find out what the rest of you thought about this film!
So I was happily just watching away waiting for the storyline to kick in, which I had no idea what was about if I'm totally honest I'd not heard of this disgusting 'Donkey Punch' sexual act before... So that happened in the film, which was all a bit fast and extremely unbelievable (and quite gross too) and the storyline jumped to a go. The first 20 minutes of the film will all the dirty sex talk and the subsequent sex seemed to kind of have a meaning when but into conjuction with that of the storyline catalyst, and I was torn between my disire to turn of the programme and sleep or watch and discover what happened to these reasonably beleivable characters. I chose to watch, and I'm glad I did. The film was simply fantastic! - In an odd kind of 'i'm-gonna-be-disturbed-forever' kind of way. But the characters ways of coping with the fact that one of their peers (and sibling of one, which did indeed make the first 20 minutes all the worse) had murdered someone in a sick sexual voilence act was brilliantly portrayed, and I think written too - and shot! There were many of the desolate shots of the yacht out in an open and lonely sea. I just thought the film was so interesting to watch, the way the characters changed so much in relation to death, and their fear of guilt and fear of jail (which says alot for the goverment system in the UK. I'm not sure if anyone else following my blog has seen this film, cause I would be intrested to find out what the rest of you thought about this film!
Sorry for the delay, it's been on slideshare for the past week just haven't got it on here...
Still to come: Casino Royale, Once Upon a Time in the West, The Departed
To investigate a recent British film of your choice and look at the success in terms of attendance, profit, awards and then do the same with a recent – similar type – of
In the UK, soap operas are one of the most popular genres, and are often broadcast during television and radio prime time. Generally British soaps are focused on the working-class, as most derived as a result of the British New Wave. Currently the most popular soaps shown in the United Kingdom are the British found soaps: Coronation Street, EastEnders, Emmerdae, Hollyoaks, Doctors but in addition to these locally found soaps there are some internationally shown shows (mainly from Australia) such as Neighbours and Home and Away.
Coronation Street, EastEnders and Emmerdale are consistently among the highest-rated shows on British television week-on-week as shown by BARB ratings. Other dramas such as Doctor Who and Spooks rarely achieve the average rating reached by these British Soap Opera's. Especially so round the holiday period which prove the most successful time of year. EastEnders currently holds the highest rated television broadcast, of a produced show rather than a broadcast of interests such as Diana's funeral, when in 1986 the Christmas episode of EastEnders was watched by over 30.15 million viewers.
Throughout the years there have also been many attempts to launch Soap Opera's which have failed, such as in 2000s ITV attempted to launch Echo Beach (Starring Jason Donovan and Martine McClutchen) which ran along side it's parody sister series about writing the show Moving Wallpaper (staring Ben Miller) however when ITV came to review and re-commission these shows only the latter survived leaving Echo Beach another failed soap opera attempt. ITV also tried to launch The Royal Today which was a daily spin-off of a very popular sixties series The Royal.
The term "Soap Opera" derives from the story behind the soap opera's being simple and squeaky clean, even though the soaps themselves have complicated narratives than can involve romance, betrayal and dark family secrets. In the 1920s, radio was booming, just as television is today, the broadcasters wanted to get advertisers in on radio so as to increase their profits. Radio stations began by convincing businesses that sold household goods to sponsor radio shows which attracted their target audiences. To appeal to their main consumers of the items - female homemakers - the radio stations created the daytime serial format which is where soaps derived from originally and the first soap ran in Chicago and was sponsored by a margarine company.
In the United Kingdom the BBC still broadcast the longest running soap which is The Archers. It’s currently running on BBC Radio 4 but first started it’s stint as on the BBC in 1951. It constantly attracts around 5 million listeners each episode or roughly around 25% of all those tuned in to the radio. The show is so popular in the popular culture of Britain that there was uproar when BBC decided to change it’s scheduling in the 90s and remove it from the prime time slot. The Archers has now run for almost 16 thousand 15 minute long episodes. Meaning over 166 non-stop days have been produced and broadcast.
Also, the Youtube video mentioned:
This video was made to get us familar with using the equipment and editing softward, you'll have noticed I posted some things on Final Cut Express earlier in the blog and that was during the creation of this video.
We had about 2 hours to go out and shoot footage for this project, and came back with around 40 minutes of actualy footage which then we crammed down into this 3 minute video clip, which is set to 'Hurricane Drunk' by Florence and the Machine. I hope you like it :)
a) encourage you to sympathise with the boys;
- Low Budget Quite often British film do not have massive budgets and big explosions or CGI etc - Ordinary People We find many British films have ordinary people in the films. - Intimate More often than not British Films are very intimate in their approach. It's very focused on the character and their character development. - Focus on Class Just like Somers Town which focuses on the working class we see realistic films which can focus on changes in middle class etc.
British New Wave 1958 - 1963
British New Wave is what we learnt to be the overall title of films made during the time period above. British film ended up in a trend which was used often, this was used to show realistic types of film to differ from the 'happily ever after' stories that cinematography had so expressively seen before the 'New Wave'
Look Back in Anger (1958)
Other films included: Room at the Top (1959), The Entertainer (1960), Billy Liar (1963), A Hard Days Night (1964), Kes (1969)
We learnt that without British New Wave and the rise of realistic films there would've been no chance of seeing things like Coronation Street and Eastenders on our tellys.
I am hopefully going to carry out my own research into these new wave films and will post things in the future on my findings!
(Including notes from the lecture!!!!!!!!)
Why I didn’t like the article?
I know this wasn’t asked for, but me and Sophie have been talking about how it’s a really pointless article, and indeed argument. I agree the article does have a reasonably humorous tone, but it doesn’t accomplish anything. The whole article does indeed point out similarities between these films, but they’re reasonably small, aren’t they? To sum up the article Queenan could have said “I watched some films, here I have picked out some similarities, I’ve not put this into context ‘cos... well they mean nothing.” He’s almost complaining that they have similarities and then saying, “but it doesn’t bother me”. Then to finish off the article he writes a humorous anecdote about ‘The Time Travellers Wife’ which doesn’t really relate to the article, except he watched that film in his week of watching films. The article isn’t as much a complaint about the ‘Unoriginal Sins’ of today’s Hollywood as it is a collaborative review of 7 of the latest films. I don’t quite understand the mind-set that Queenan must’ve been in writing this article (nor do I quite trust his opinion on film as he was intent on writing an entire article on why ‘The Hottie and the Nottie was a poor film, when that’s quite apparent), was his intent to go to the cinema, spend £45.50 on films he didn’t really wanna see just to point out that they had little bits that were similar? Or did he decide to spend £45.50 (based on Vue Norwich’s Adult prices) to do a bit of research on film? I think this is why the article feels so empty, because he went expecting to hate the films because they’d be similar, yet found he enjoyed them none-the-less and had nothing to complain about but still had an article to write... bravo Joe Queenan!"
‘Before Viewing’ – Prep Task on ‘Somers Town’
1. Why do you think a modern director would choose to produce a film in black and white, rather than in colour? What effects might they be hoping to achieve?
Although I feel that shooting in black and white in modern times isn’t really to my particular taste there are many modern films that use this technique. Each to their own, but the reasons behind Shane Meadows shooting entirely in black and white I will hopefully successfully explore below.
Since the invention of movies in colour in film and television, around 1950, it has become the Hollywood norm. It’s a standard in the entire industry and is seen quite prominently to be a risk by the distributer to produce a film solely in black and white. One example of this is shown through Frank Darabont’s adaptation of the well known Steven King novella ‘The Mist’ it was intended to be shot and shown in black and white (perhaps to add an eeriness to the film) but was eventually pushed by the production company as a full colour film. It’s massively common to find many black and white films among student and independent film (as Somers Town is) Because of this black and white is now seen as a rare artistic choice by the director. This is seemingly true as many modern black and white films have been chosen as black and white solely for artistic purposes which help visually back up the narrative. One reason that is common among modern black and white films is it helps visualise and establish a time setting. One could see this as the reason in which Shane Meadow’s reason for filming in black and white because as I am aware it is set around 10-20 years ago. Although this technique could be seen as the idea that it was shot around the time it was set, which would exclude Somers Town, I’m sure black and white helps give the feeling it is set in the past if not much has changed (which indeed it hasn’t since the 90s)
The choice to shoot in black and white could also be to show the tone and the mood of the film. Parts of films can also be shot in black and white to establish the same feel, a notable one of these is ‘Casino Royale’ the 21st James Bond film which begins in black and white. Dream sequences are quite often shot in black and white which I think runs parallel to the fact that humans are supposedly only to dream in black and white. Linking to this, a side thought I’ve just had. If we dream in black and white then films could be shot in black and white to give a dream like feel to the film.
2. From the list of modern films shot in black and white you were given. Choose three and find out their release date, their genre, the director’s reputation and the critical reaction to the film.
Clerks (1994) – Clerks is an American Comedy film penned, produced and directed by Kevin Smith. The film was a surprisi
ng success and made over $3 Million and was made on a budget of only $27,000. This movie describes a day in the life of two clerks in New Jersey. It covers their various mishaps and misdemeanours, which include drug dealers, a wake, a dead customer, and a lot of abuse of customers. The use of black and white on this film was only used due to budgetary restraints (the film was funded wholly by the director) the budget that they were working with didn’t have enough money to rent daylight sources. It won a handful of awards and is features on many lists including ‘The Cult 25’ in which it performed at number 13.
Sin City (2005) – Sin City is a film noir styled action/crime/thriller film. The film is based on a graphic novel from Frank Miller and it is shown in the picture to the right that the use of film noir was purely to duplicate the artistic design and vision from the original graphic novel. It uses the visual black and white with colourised elements that work as
direct representations to the graphic novel. The film itself was filmed in colour and then transferred over to high quality black and white, it literally uses a shot for shot technique (as shown in the picture) The film was opened to hugely popular reviews and the film was compared favourable to other comic book films released around the same time.
Schindler's List (1995) – The film is directed by massively known Steven Speilberg. The film is about how one businessman saved the lives of over a thousand Polish Jews during the Holocaust. This is arguably the most famous black and white piece of modern cinematography. The film uses black and white and a slight documentary style to create a horrific sense of realism and the period the film is set in. The film was shot completely exempt from modern techniques such as cranes, zoom lenses and steadicam, many of the moving shots were even hand-held, all this adds to the gritty realism of the film. The film notably caused problems for the set designers who were used to working with colour, they had to darken and lighten aspects and the costumes to stop things blending in to the background. They used colourised elements (as Sin City did) with one little girls red coat to symbolise blood on the hands of the allied forces. The film is widely critically acclaimed, it won seven Oscars and features on many Top 100 films lists.
3. The film is named after Somers Town, the part of London in which it is set. Most of the filming also took place on location in that area.
a) Given the London location, what iconographic sights and sounds might you expect from the film?
I expect a lot of classic London digetic sounds, such as London busses passing etc. I expect the sight of the big red London bus (although the film is in black and white) I’d also expect many sight-seeing areas to be shown on the film around London such as the famous bridge which looks over the parliament used in a lot of film and television such as Doctor Who and 23 Days Later. This may sound reasonably stereotypical but I’m aware the film is set around an low class estate so I would expect to here digetic background noises of people arguing etc.
b) What are you expectations about character and narrative based on this setting?
I wouldn’t say I have any real assumptions purely based on the setting. But many poor people are from this area and the film is based around a young homeless boy I believe so I’d probably expect an unruly lonesome child figure. Looking for his place in the world, a ‘coming of age’ narrative is probably what I’d expect. I’d also figure that discrimination would fit into the narrative somewhere, as the time and setting of the film lower classes would’ve been highly discriminated.
'After Viewing' Coming Soon!